1.中国航发 沈阳发动机研究所, 辽宁 沈阳 110015
2.中国航空发动机集团 航空发动机动力传输重点实验室, 辽宁 沈阳 110015
扫 描 看 全 文
滕文爽,郭梅,宋振海.HB与ISO锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算标准比较[J].机械传动,2021,45(04):156-159.
Teng Wenshuang,Guo Mei,Song Zhenhai.Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength[J].Journal of Mechanical Transmission,2021,45(04):156-159.
滕文爽,郭梅,宋振海.HB与ISO锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算标准比较[J].机械传动,2021,45(04):156-159. DOI: 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025.
Teng Wenshuang,Guo Mei,Song Zhenhai.Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength[J].Journal of Mechanical Transmission,2021,45(04):156-159. DOI: 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025.
为正确评估不同标准中的齿轮强度计算结果,分析和比较了我国航空工业标准(HB)与国际标准化组织标准(ISO)计算锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳承载能力的差异。通过计算方法比较和实例计算对比两种途径,找出了两种标准计算公式的差异、修正系数种类、取值上的差异及其对计算结果的影响。研究结果表明,ISO标准比HB标准考虑的影响因素更多、范围更广,特别是在动载系数计算上存在较大差异,使得ISO标准计算接触应力基本值更小、计算接触应力相当、许用接触应力更大。
In order to correctly evaluate the gear strength calculation results in different standards, the difference between Chinese aviation industry standard (HB) and international standardization organization standard (ISO) in calculating the load capacity of bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue is analyzed and compared. Through the two ways of comparison of calculation methods and examples, the differences of the two standard calculation formulas, the types of correction coefficients, the differences in values and their effects on the calculation results are found out. The results show that the ISO standard considers more influence factors than the HB standard, and the range is wider. Especially, there is a great difference in the calculation of dynamic load coefficient, which makes the basic value of contact stress calculated by ISO standard smaller, the calculated contact stress equivalent, and the allowable contact stress larger.
HB标准ISO标准锥齿轮接触疲劳差异
HB standardISO standardBevel gearContact fatigueDifference
林基恕.航空燃气涡轮发动机机械系统设计[M].北京:航空工业出版社,2005:150-157.
LIN Jishu.Transmission design of aero engine[M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press,2005:150-157.
杨荣,陈聪慧,战鹏,等.大功率弧齿锥齿轮设计技术研究[J].航空发动机,2012,38(5):22-26.
YANG Rong,CHEN Conghui,ZHAN Peng,et al.Research of high power spiral bevel gears[J].Aeroengine,2012,38(5):22-26.
International Organization for Standardization.ISO 10300-1:2001 Calculation of load capacity of bevel gears-Part 2:Calculation of surface durability(pitting)[S].Switzerland:BSI,2001:1-58.
International Organization for Standardization.ISO 10300-2:2001 Calculation of load capacity of bevel gears-Part 1:Introduction and general influence factors[S].Switzerland:BSI,2001:1-30.
American Gear Manufactures Association.AGMA 2003-B97 Rating the pitting resistance and bending strength of generated straight bevel,zerol bevel and spiral bevel gear teeth[S].United States of America:American Gear Manufactures Association,2003:1-75.
航空工业部三○一所.航空锥齿轮承载能力一般系数计算:HB/Z89.1-85[S].中华人民共和国航空工业部,1985:1-19.
Minstry of Aviation Industry 301 Research Institute.General factory of aviation bevel gear bearing capacity calculation:HB/Z89.1-85[S].Ministry of Aviation Industry of China,1985:1-19.
航空工业部三○一所.航空锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算:HB/Z89.2-85[S].中华人民共和国航空工业部,1985:1-5.
Minstry of Aviation Industry 301 Research Institute.Surface durability methods for bevel gear:HB/Z89.2-85[S].Ministry of Aviation Industry of China,1985:1-19.
全国齿轮标准化技术委员会.锥齿轮承载能力计算方法 第1部分 概述和通用影响系数:GB/T 10062.1-2003[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003:1-36.
National Technical Committee of Gear Standardization.Calculation of load capacity of bevel gear—Part 1 Introduction and general influence factors:GB/T 10062.1-2003[S].Beijing:Standards of China,2003:1-36. (下转第176页)
0
浏览量
7
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构