Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength

Wenshuang Teng; Mei Guo; Zhenhai Song

doi:10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength

Development·Application | 更新时间：2022-11-10

- Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength
- Journal of Mechanical Transmission Vol. 45, Issue 4, Pages: 156-159(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国航发沈阳发动机研究所，辽宁沈阳 110015
  2.中国航空发动机集团航空发动机动力传输重点实验室，辽宁沈阳 110015
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025
  CLC：
扫描看全文
滕文爽,郭梅,宋振海.HB与ISO锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算标准比较[J].机械传动,2021,45(04):156-159.

Teng Wenshuang,Guo Mei,Song Zhenhai.Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength[J].Journal of Mechanical Transmission,2021,45(04):156-159.
滕文爽,郭梅,宋振海.HB与ISO锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算标准比较[J].机械传动,2021,45(04):156-159. DOI： 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025.

Teng Wenshuang,Guo Mei,Song Zhenhai.Comparison Between HB and ISO Standard for Calculating Bevel Gear Tooth Surface Contact Fatigue Strength[J].Journal of Mechanical Transmission,2021,45(04):156-159. DOI： 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2021.04.025.

摘要

为正确评估不同标准中的齿轮强度计算结果，分析和比较了我国航空工业标准（HB）与国际标准化组织标准（ISO）计算锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳承载能力的差异。通过计算方法比较和实例计算对比两种途径，找出了两种标准计算公式的差异、修正系数种类、取值上的差异及其对计算结果的影响。研究结果表明，ISO标准比HB标准考虑的影响因素更多、范围更广，特别是在动载系数计算上存在较大差异，使得ISO标准计算接触应力基本值更小、计算接触应力相当、许用接触应力更大。

Abstract

In order to correctly evaluate the gear strength calculation results in different standards， the difference between Chinese aviation industry standard （HB） and international standardization organization standard （ISO） in calculating the load capacity of bevel gear tooth surface contact fatigue is analyzed and compared. Through the two ways of comparison of calculation methods and examples， the differences of the two standard calculation formulas， the types of correction coefficients， the differences in values and their effects on the calculation results are found out. The results show that the ISO standard considers more influence factors than the HB standard， and the range is wider. Especially， there is a great difference in the calculation of dynamic load coefficient， which makes the basic value of contact stress calculated by ISO standard smaller， the calculated contact stress equivalent， and the allowable contact stress larger.

关键词

HB标准ISO标准锥齿轮接触疲劳差异

Keywords

HB standardISO standardBevel gearContact fatigueDifference

references

林基恕.航空燃气涡轮发动机机械系统设计［M］.北京：航空工业出版社，2005：150-157.

LIN Jishu.Transmission design of aero engine［M］.Beijing：Aviation Industry Press，2005：150-157.

杨荣，陈聪慧，战鹏，等.大功率弧齿锥齿轮设计技术研究［J］.航空发动机，2012，38（5）：22-26.

YANG Rong，CHEN Conghui，ZHAN Peng，et al.Research of high power spiral bevel gears［J］.Aeroengine，2012，38（5）：22-26.

International Organization for Standardization.ISO 10300-1：2001 Calculation of load capacity of bevel gears-Part 2：Calculation of surface durability（pitting）［S］.Switzerland：BSI，2001：1-58.

International Organization for Standardization.ISO 10300-2：2001 Calculation of load capacity of bevel gears-Part 1：Introduction and general influence factors［S］.Switzerland：BSI，2001：1-30.

American Gear Manufactures Association.AGMA 2003-B97 Rating the pitting resistance and bending strength of generated straight bevel，zerol bevel and spiral bevel gear teeth［S］.United States of America：American Gear Manufactures Association，2003：1-75.

航空工业部三○一所.航空锥齿轮承载能力一般系数计算：HB/Z89.1-85［S］.中华人民共和国航空工业部，1985：1-19.

Minstry of Aviation Industry 301 Research Institute.General factory of aviation bevel gear bearing capacity calculation：HB/Z89.1-85［S］.Ministry of Aviation Industry of China，1985：1-19.

航空工业部三○一所.航空锥齿轮齿面接触疲劳强度计算：HB/Z89.2-85［S］.中华人民共和国航空工业部，1985：1-5.

Minstry of Aviation Industry 301 Research Institute.Surface durability methods for bevel gear：HB/Z89.2-85［S］.Ministry of Aviation Industry of China，1985：1-19.

全国齿轮标准化技术委员会.锥齿轮承载能力计算方法第1部分概述和通用影响系数：GB/T 10062.1-2003［S］.北京：中国标准出版社，2003：1-36.

National Technical Committee of Gear Standardization.Calculation of load capacity of bevel gear—Part 1 Introduction and general influence factors：GB/T 10062.1-2003［S］.Beijing：Standards of China，2003：1-36. （下转第176页）

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comparison between ISO and AGMA Bevel Gear Strength Calculation Standard

Backlash Control and the Fatigue Life Bench Test of Bevel Gears from Inter-axle Differential

Research Status of Initiation and Expansion Behavior of Gear Fatigue Cracks

Review on the Effect of Microstructure on Gear Contact Fatigue

Discussing the Cutting Method of Skew Bevel Bear based on the Tooth Surface Generating Line

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University

Training Base, Army Engineering University of PLA

China MCC 22 Group Co., Ltd.

College of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology

Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering Co.， Ltd.

⁰